Fiat Lux & Academic Advising

As Fiat Lux prepares for the Secondary Advising presentation for the UCAAC conference and as we plan for the next academic year, we would like the input from all Academic Advisors at UC Merced.  This survey should take about 5-10 minutes and we would greatly appreciate your feedback. 

 

To include your feedback and survey responses in the UCAAC presentation, please complete by 12 noon Wednesday, April 29th.  If you are not able to complete by this date, please complete at your earliest convenience as we would still like to have your feedback for planning purposes. 

Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrong AgreeNot Applicable
Fiat Lux students are more likely to come in to see their School/Major advisor or peer. *
I feel like I can communicate with any of the Fiat Lux Counselors regarding specific student situations. *
Students who see a Fiat Lux Counselor recieve inadequete or misinformation *
I spend less time advising students who are part of Fiat Lux and have seen a Fiat Lux Counselor *
Students who have seen a Fiat Lux Counselor have more specific questions than those who do not see a Fiat Lux Counselor *
Fiat Lux Counselors should not be serving as Secondary Advisors to students *
Fiat Lux shares student information as necessary with the primary academic advisors. *
Fiat Lux should continue to require students to see their School/Major advisor *
What is your general perception of Fiat Lux Counselors serving as Secondary Advisors?
In what ways can Fiat Lux serving as Secondary Advisors be improved? What is not working regarding Fiat Lux Counselors serving as secondary advisors?
What is working with Fiat Lux Counselors serving as Secondary Advisors? What are some of the benefits?
How can Fiat Lux Counselors/Secondary Advisors support primary advisors/major advisors?
Any additional comments you would like to share please do so.